Petitioner's appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as he did not appear for the hearing, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT CHANDIGARH
__** *
Criminal Misc. No. M – 16195 of 2011. Date of decision: December 17, 2012.
Sanjeev Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and another.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI.
Present: None for the petitioner.
Shri Kirat Singh, Deputy A.G.Punjab.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (ORAL)
The case has been called thrice. No one has put in appearance for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
December 17, 2012. (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) malik JUDGE
Sanjeev Kumar
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
