A criminal revision filed by Major Singh @ Mithu was dismissed as infructuous by this Court because the underlying trial proceedings had already been concluded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Revision No.3273 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.07.2012
Major Singh @ Mithu
. . . .Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
. . . . Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr.Janak Singh, Advocate, for Mr.D.S. Malwai, Advocate, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for the State.
Mr.P.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
JASBIR SINGH, ACJ. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner states that since the trial has been concluded, this criminal revision has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(JASBIR SINGH)
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
JULY 25, 2012 Vivek
Major Singh @ Mithu
State of Punjab
JASBIR SINGH
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
