The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed a miscellaneous petition for non-prosecution as both sides failed to appear on hearing dates.
None granted. Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-7686 of 2009 Date of decision : 28.05.2012
Dharam Singh and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Nemo for the petitioners.
Mr. C.S. Brar, D.A.G., Punjab for respondent No.1.
Nemo for respondent No.2.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
The bare perusal of the record would reveal that nemo had appeared on behalf of the petitioners on 14.05.2012, when this petition was listed for hearing. Consequently, in the interest of justice, it was adjourned for today for arguments.
Today again, as nobody is appearing on behalf of the petitioners despite repeated calls, therefore, the present petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
May 28, 2012 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Dharam Singh and another
State of Punjab and another
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
