Allowed
Jeet Singh and Anr. v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/37646/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 37646 of 2011 (O&M)
Jeet Singh & another
.....Petitioners
VERSUS
The State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. R.S. Rai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. DS Brar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Shalini Attri, D. A.G., Haryana, for the State.
Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, for the complainant.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The allegations against the petitioners, who are father-in law and mother-in-law, are similar to those of other co-accused, who were found innocent, but have now been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. They have already been released on bail. Though order of summoning under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has been upheld by this Court, allegations being identical, the petitioners would have to be kept at par. It is also pointed out before me that the complainant has turned hostile and has not supported the prosecution case.
Without making any comment on merit, bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Gurgaon.
April 03, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE
Jeet Singh & another
The State of Haryana
RANJIT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court