Pritam v. Mukesh and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-paragraph order dismissing petitioner's prayer for case transfer due to threat, granting security to State counsel instead.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for transfer is declined.
Single-paragraph order dismissing petitioner's prayer for case transfer due to threat, granting security to State counsel instead.
Prayer for transfer is declined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-1269 of 2012(O&M)
Pritam
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
Smt. Mukesh
....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
PRESENT: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana, for the State.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
State counsel, on instructions, says that if the petitioner is facing any threat, he would be granted adequate security in accordance with law. Accordingly, the ground as pleaded by the petitioner cannot be taken into consideration for transferring the case. The prayer is, therefore, declined.
Dismissed.
April 02, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE
Pritam
Smt. Mukesh
RANJIT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court