A criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition on better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at
Chandigarh.
Crl.Misc.No.61584 of 2011 and Crl.Misc.No.M-34217 of 2011. Date of Decision:- 13.02.2012.
Rohtash
Petitioner.
Versus
State of Haryana and another Respondents.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI.
Present: - Mr.Rahul Deswal,Advocate, for Mr. Surender Deswal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for
withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
13.02.2012
Anoop
Rohtash
State of Haryana
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
