The petitioner sought bail relying on the co-accused's bail cancellation notice. The court found no case for bail and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.-M No.31935 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 19, 2012
Amolak Singh alias Mauli
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Satbir Gill, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The co-accused has been put to notice for cancellation of his bail, on which the reliance is placed by the petitioner to seek bail. No case for grant of bail, therefore, is made out.
Dismissed.
October 19, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in reliance on the co-accused's bail cancellation notice.
Amolak Singh alias Mauli
State of Haryana
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
