Petitioner sought withdrawal of her writ petition to pursue alternative remedies. The High Court allowed the withdrawal.
Allowance of withdrawal of the petition to enable resort to alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
Crl.Misc.No.M- 31463 of 2012 (O&M). Date of Decision:- 06.10.2012.
Nitu Goel
Petitioner.
Versus
State of Punjab and others
Respondents.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI.
Present: - Mr.Bhupinder Singh Bairagi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI,J.
At the very out set, learned counsel for the
petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedies available to him under law.
Allowed as prayed for.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
06.10.2012 Anoop
Nitu Goel
State of Punjab
Naresh Kumar Sanghi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
