The court made the ad-interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner absolute. The petitioner must continue to join the investigation when required and comply with conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
Ad-interim anticipatory bail order dated 7.8.2012 made absolute subject to joining investigation and complying with Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 23533 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 5, 2012
Jai Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Nonish Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, Addl. AG, Haryana, for the respondent.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
October 5, 2012 Pkapoor
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the ad-interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner should be made absolute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jai Singh
State of Haryana
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
