Petitioner withdrew the criminal miscellaneous petition to enable filing a complaint before the Area Judicial Magistrate. Court disposed of the matter on withdrawal.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a complaint before the Area Judicial Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
Crl.Misc.No.M-30863 of 2012 (O&M). Date of Decision:- 05.12.2012.
Ruby
Petitioner.
Versus
State of Haryana and others.
Respondents.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI.
Present: - Mr.Puneet Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI,J.
After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioner to file a complaint before the learned Area Judicial Magistrate, in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty
aforesaid.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
05.12.2012. Anoop
Ruby
State of Haryana
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
