The Court granted bail to the petitioners without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, allowing the case to proceed to be examined by the CJM/Duty Magistrate at Karnal.
Bail granted to petitioners, conditioned to satisfy the satisfaction of the CJM/Duty Magistrate, Karnal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.-M No.30633 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 07, 2012
Sahida & others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Virender Kumar, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Ms.Kirti Singh, DAG, Haryana, for the State.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
As per the State counsel, by now only 8 witnesses out of 44 witnesses have been examined. Still, it will take time for the trial to conclude. Some of the co-accused have already been extended the concession of bail.
Without expressing any view on merits, bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Karnal.
Petition is allowed.
November 07, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the petitioners.
Whether the judgment should be reported.
Sahida & others
State of Haryana
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
