Petition declared infructuous as highered petitioners were discharged by trial court following a compromise, rendering the criminal miscellaneous petition without purpose.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M-29364 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 22, 2012
Baldev Singh & Anr.
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab & Anr.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr.Rupam Aggarwal, Addl.Advocate General, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC Sohan Lal, Police Station, Women Cell, District Jalandhar, submits that in view of the compromise, the petitioners have been discharged by the learned trial court vide its order dated 20.11.2012.
In view of the above, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of as having become infructuous.
November 22, 2012 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
Baldev Singh & Anr.
State of Punjab & Anr.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
