Harpreet Singh Harry v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M-26970 of 2012 Date of Decision : November 22, 2012
Harpreet Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.S.S.Salar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Rupam Aggarwal, Addl.Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Mr.Rajbir Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.4,6, 7, 9, & 11.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the report under Section 173, Cr.P.C has been submitted before the learned Area Judicial Magistrate.
Disposed of as having become infructuous.
November 22, 2012 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
Harpreet Singh
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court