The petitioner withdrew the criminal miscellaneous petition as the trial court had reserved its order; the bench dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M-17509 of 2011 Date of Decision: 21 November,2012
Lakhbir Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
Swaran Singh
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Narinder S.Lucky, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Pankaj Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after
hearing the arguments, the learned trial court has reserved the order, therefore, he does not press this petition at this stage and
prays for withdrawal of the same.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
21st November, 2012
seema
(Naresh Kumar Sanghi)
Judge
Lakhbir Singh
Swaran Singh
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
