Petitioner's criminal miscellaneous petition withdrawn to pursue revision remedy before revisional court; discretionally if delay condonation application is filed, it will be sympathetically considered.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file condonation of delay application if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-28957 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.05.2012
Sanjeev Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
Des Raj and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Nemo for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. Tejinder Singh Salana, D.A.G., Punjab for respondent No.3.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present
petition to enable the petitioner to avail his remedy of revision petition before the revisional Court.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.
Needless to mention that if the petitioner moves an application for
condonation of delay, then the same will be considered by the concerned Court sympathetically.
May 11, 2012 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Sanjeev Kumar
Des Raj
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
