The main petition to quash the FIR and subsequent proceedings was withdrawn by the petitioners to enable them to file a fresh petition based on a compromise between the parties.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition for quashing based on compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-16835 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 10.05.2012
Baldev Singh Gill and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Jasdeep Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Tejinder Singh Salana, D.A.G., Punjab for respondent No.1.
Mr. Bipin Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arvind Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.2.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the main petition to enable the petitioners to file fresh petition for quashing the impugned FIR (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise between the parties.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.
May 10, 2012 naresh.k
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) Judge
Baldev Singh Gill
State of Punjab
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
