This is a one-line order where the Single Judge disposed of a Criminal Revision matter because the petitioner joined the investigation, making the earlier order absolute.
The order dated 09.10.2012 is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-28834 OF 2012 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 20.11.2012
Sudesh Kumari
...Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. Ranjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, DAG, Punjab.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Gurwinder Singh, has stated at the bar that petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for further investigation.
So, in these circumstances, the order dated 09.10.2012 is made absolute.
Disposed of.
NOVEMBER 20, 2012 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
Sudesh Kumari
State of Punjab
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
