The petitioner filed a matrimonial petition. The State counsel reported a compromise between private parties and that respondent Nos. 4 to 6 have no objection to the marriage. The court passed no further orders and disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 28758 of 2012 (O&M)
Date of Decision: October 30, 2012
Rajbir Kaur @ Raji and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Shilesh Gupta, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
None for respondent Nos. 4 to 6.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) October 30, 2012 JUDGE Pkapoor
Rajbir Kaur @ Raji and another
State of Punjab and others
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
