No substantive information available; represents a notice of motion dismissed as not pressed after failed settlement exploration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-22801 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.10.2012
Sangeeta Kumari
.... Petitioner
Versus
Rajinder Kumar & anr. .... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Bharat Bhushan Sethi, Advocate for the respondents.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Notice of motion was issued to explore the possibility
of settlement between the parties.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that no
amicable settlement has been arrived at.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition.
Dismissed as not pressed.
October 19, 2012 sonia
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
Sangeeta Kumari
Rajinder Kumar
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
