The court allowed Crl. Misc. No. 55511 of 2012 to re-read the offence under Section 402 IPC instead of Section 420 IPC. Crl. Misc. No. M-28185 of 2012 was dismissed as withdrawn.
Crl. Misc. No. 55511 allowed; offence read as S. 402 IPC. Crl. Misc. No. M-28185 dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to move for regular bail granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-28185 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.09.2012
Gurcharan Singh @ Kala
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: - Mr. S.S. Sodhi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Jaspreet Kaur, AAG, Punjab.
PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL)
Crl. Misc. No.55511 of 2012
For the reasons stated, Crl. Misc. is allowed. Offence be read as under Section 402 IPC instead of Section 420 IPC.
Crl. Misc. No. M-28185 of 2012
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to surrender before the trial Court and move application for regular bail.
Dismissed as withdrawn. If application for regular bail is moved, the same may be decided in accordance with law.
(Paramjeet Singh) Judge
September 21, 2012 R.S.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to withdraw the petition with liberty to surrender for regular bail.
Whether to re-read the offence under Section 402 IPC instead of Section 420 IPC.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Gurcharan Singh @ Kala
State of Punjab
PARAMJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
