The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the framing of charges. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn subject to the granted liberty.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the framing of charges.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M- No. 20991 of 2012
Date of Decision : September 21, 2012
Jagdish Kumar
...... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present : Mr. J.S. Brar, Advocate for Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Jaspreet Kaur, AAG, Punjab.
Paramjeet Singh, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the framing of charges before the appropriate court.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Paramjeet Singh)
Judge
21.09.2012
Anand
Jagdish Kumar
State of Punjab
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
