The single judge held that the present petition has become infructuous and disposed of the matter accordingly without providing substantive reasoning or citing specific legal provisions.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(240) CRM-M-27775-2011 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M NO. 27775 OF 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 6, 2012
Sukhpreet Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. H.S. Dhillon, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Surjeet Singh Chaudhary, DAG, Punjab, for the respondent.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of accordingly.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
November 6, 2012 Pkapoor
Sukhpreet Singh
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
