Darshan Singh v. State of Punjab and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedies.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRM-M No. 16243 of 2011 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 16243 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 5, 2012
Darshan Singh
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. K.S. Boparai, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Harsimrat Rai, DAG, Punjab, for respondent No. 1.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel prays for withdrawal of the present petition with the liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedies available to him under law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty
aforesaid.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) November 5, 2012 JUDGE Pkapoor
Darshan Singh
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court