Petitioner Madan Lal filed a bail petition seeking to make interim bail absolute. The Court found allegations were false and no FIR was registered, leading to the conversion of interim bail to absolute bail pending trial.
The interim bail granted by the Trial Court is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M No. 26783 of 2012 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 26783 of 2012 (O&M)
Date of Decision: November 7, 2012
Madan Lal
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Harsimrat Rai, DAG, Punjab, for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
2
CRM-M No. 26783 of 2012 (O&M)
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) November 7, 2012 JUDGE Pkapoor
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim bail granted to the petitioner should be made absolute in light of no FIR being registered against him.
Madan Lal
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
