Single judge dismissed an application for anticipatory bail. The court held that the petitioner, facing trials in five cases, failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances warranting bail at that stage.
The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc.No.M-26692 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : 16.11.2012
Gurmukh Singh
.. Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.C.PURI
Present : Mr.G.S.Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Chabra, DAG, Punjab.
K.C.Pur, J.(Oral) ,
Learned State counsel has submitted that the petitioner is facing
trial in five more cases, detail of which is as under:-
Grant of bail at this stage shall hamper the investigation. No
exceptional circumstance for grant of anticipatory is made out.
Dismissed.
( K.C.Puri )
16.11.2012 Judge sd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner facing trials in five concurrent criminal cases.
Gurmukh Singh
State of Punjab
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
