Disposed
Navin Deora v. State of Punjab
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/26504/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-26504 OF 2012(O&M) DECIDED ON : 16.11.2012
Navin Deora @ Timmy
...Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. P. K. Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Yatharth Hans, Advocate, for the complainant.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Balwinder Singh, has stated at the bar that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for further investigation.
So, the order dated 30.08.2012 passed by this Court,
is made absolute.
Disposed of.
NOVEMBER 16, 2012 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
Navin Deora @ Timmy
State of Punjab
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court