Babbu @ Mumark v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the petition for anticipatory bail. The petition was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Petition for anticipatory bail withdrawn and dismissed.
Petitioner withdrew the petition for anticipatory bail. The petition was dismissed.
Petition for anticipatory bail withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-25646 OF 2012(O&M) DECIDED ON : 27.08.2012
Babbu @ Mumark
...Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Ms. Anju Arora, Advocate.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw
the present petition for grant of anticipatory bail.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
AUGUST 27, 2012 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
Babbu @ Mumark
State of Punjab
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court