The petition was dismissed as infructuous since the underlying FIR had already been quashed in a connected miscellaneous matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-21936 OF 2012(O&M) DECIDED ON : 27.08.2012
Pooja Jain
...Petitioner
versus
State of U.T., Chandigarh
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. Bipan Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sukant Gupta, Advocate, Standing counsel for U.T., Chandigarh.
Mr. Karanvir Singh Khehar, Advocate, for the complainant.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
Since the FIR in question has been quashed vide Crl.
Misc. No. M-23554 of 2012 titled as, “ Pooja Jain vs. State of
U.T., Chandigarh and another ”, the present petition has
become infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
AUGUST 27, 2012 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
Pooja Jain
State of U.T., Chandigarh
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
