A petition was dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner filed a statement alleging a peaceful life with the other petitioner, rendering protection unnecessary.
Petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.M.No. M-24947 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision : 9.11.2012
Harpreet Kaur and another
................Petitioners
vs.
State of Punjab and others
.................Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri
Present: None for the petitioners.
Sh.Sandeep Chhabra, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
K.C. Puri, J.
Reply has been filed. In the reply Annexure R-1 has been placed on the file, in which petitioner No.1 Harpreet Kaur has made a statement that she and petitioner No.2 Gursewak Singh are living a peaceful life and they need no protection.
So, in view of the statement, the petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
( K.C. Puri ) 9.11.2012 Judge chugh
Harpreet Kaur
Gursewak Singh
State of Punjab
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
