Petitioner's petition declared infructuous due to prior submission of cancellation report to Judicial Magistrate; disposed of without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-24578 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.12.2012
Amandeep Kaur
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others .... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rupam Kumar Aggarwal, DAG, Punjab.
None for respondents No.4 to 7.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the fact that the cancellation report (report under Section 173 Cr.PC) has already been presented before the learned Area Judicial Magistrate, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
The petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
December 13, 2012 sonia
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
Amandeep Kaur
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
