Petitioner sought to withdraw the present petition to file a fresh one after the Division Bench's decision on the same issue. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M-23498 of 2012 Date of Decision: 12th December, 2012
Jatinder Kumar
...Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Ankur Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Harsimrat Rai, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioner to file fresh one after delivery of the decision by the Division Bench of this Court with regard to the same issue.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
December 12, 2012 seema
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
Jatinder Kumar
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
