Petitioner in Criminal Misc. No. M-16001 of 2009 was granted liberty to withdraw the petition and reclaim all pleas to raise before the trial court. Impugned order was dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all pleas before the learned trial court at an appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M-16001 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : October 04, 2012
Sudesh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Rakesh Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Shekhar Mudgal, AAG, Haryana. Mr.N.K.Malhotra, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to raise all the pleas, taken in this petition, before the learned trial Court at an appropriate stage.
Allowed as prayed for.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
October 04, 2012 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
Sudesh
State of Haryana
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
