Hearing of the petitioner who stated that having filed a separate petition challenging the charge framing order, this memorandum of objection is no longer pressed. The Court has disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 22939 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 17, 2012
Shakti Sagar Bhatia
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Jaspreet Singh, AAG, Punjab, for the respondents.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
October 17, 2012 PKapoor
Shakti Sagar Bhatia
State of Punjab
another
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
