Petitioner withdrew the petition pursuant to an application by proxy counsel, with no objection from the respondents. The present appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 14430 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 17, 2012
Gurdeep Singh Bajwa
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Ms. Harsimarjeet Kaur, Advocate, for Ms. K.K. Kahlon, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. V.P.S. Sidhu, AAG, Punjab, for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned proxy counsel states that she has been authorized to withdraw the present petition and as such prays for withdrawal of the petition.
Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the above prayer of the learned proxy counsel.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
October 17, 2012 PKapoor
Gurdeep Singh Bajwa
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
