A writ petition challenging the order of framing of charges was disposed of as the learned counsel for the petitioners did not press the petition since a separate petition contesting the framing order was filed by the petitioners after the charges were framed by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 20698 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 17, 2012
Mohan Lal and another
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Jaspreet Singh, AAG, Punjab, for the respondents.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
October 17, 2012 PKapoor
Mohan Lal
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
