Petitioner requested to declare himself innocent after investigating agency did so. Court found petition infructuous and disposed of it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRM-M No. 20969 of 2011 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 20969 of 2011 (O&M)
Date of Decision: November 5, 2012
Gurwinder Singh
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
…Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. D.S. Brar, Advocate, for Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Shekhar Mudgal, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous since the petitioner has been declared innocent by the investigating agency.
Disposed of accordingly.
November 5, 2012 Pkapoor
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
Gurwinder Singh
State of Haryana
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
