Petitioner requested withdrawal of the petition with liberty to pursue alternative legal remedies. The High Court granted this request and disposed of the matter on withdrawal.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to approach alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 19713 of 2011 (O&M)
Date of Decision: November 3, 2012
Kamaldeep Arora
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Sanjay Tangri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Anupam Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana, for respondent No. 1.
Mr. S.S. Narula, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedies available under law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
November 3, 2012 PKapoor
Kamaldeep Arora
State of Haryana
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
