Allowed

Purnima Sharma and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC10 Jul 2012CRM-M/19832/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought protection under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The Court allowed the petition with direction to the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, to take appropriate action on a specific application made by the petitioner without examining the merits.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed with direction to respondent no. 2, Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, to take appropriate action on application dated 2.7.2012 (Annexure P5).

Purnima Sharma and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2012) — LawSathi Research

¶1

-1-

¶2

Crl.M.No.M-19832 of 2012(O&M)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

Crl.M.No.M-19832 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: July 10, 2012

¶5

Purnima Sharma and another

¶6

.....Petitioners

¶7

¶8

State of Punjab and others

¶9

......Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA

¶11

Present: Mr.Harish Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶12

.......

¶13

RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶14

Crl.M.No.38393 of 2012

¶15

Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶16

Crl.M.No.M-19832 of 2012

¶17

The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent nos.4 to 8.

¶18

Heard.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 2.7.2012, Annexure P5, already made to him by the petitioners.

¶20

As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. Date of birth of petitioner no.1-Purnima Sharma, as per copy of Matriculation Examination Certificate, Annexure P1, is 15.1.1994 and date

¶21

Crl.M.No.M-19832 of 2012(O&M)

¶22

-2-

¶23

of birth of petitioner No.2- Karan Arora as per copy of Matriculation Examination Certificate, Annexure P2, is 7.7.1993. They got married on 30.6.2012. Photographs of the marriage are Annexures P3 and P4.

¶24

In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 2.7.2012, Annexure P5, already stated to have been moved to him by petitioner no.1.

¶25

10.7.2012 meenu

¶26

(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge

Purnima Sharma and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Purnima Sharma and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh & Ors. Vs Dharam Pal

Ravinder Vs State of Haryana

Ravinder Singh Bhaau Vs State of Punjab

Jaspal Kaur Vs State of Punjab

Khushpreet Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Ranvir Singh @ Ladi Mann Vs State of Punjab