Manoj Kumar v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
An incidental order disposing of a withdrawn writ petition with liberty to file afresh after examination of material witnesses.
An incidental order disposing of a withdrawn writ petition with liberty to file afresh after examination of material witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-19269-2012 (O&M). Date of decision: September 20, 2012.
MANOJ KUMAR
..... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT Mr.S.N.Saini, Adv., Mr.Amit Saini, Adv., for the petitioner.
Ms.Shalini Attri, DAG., Haryana.
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
It has been informed that out of 14 witnesses only 8 have been examined. The material witnesses are yet to be examined.
Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition, at this stage, with liberty to file afresh after examination of material witnesses.
Disposed of as withdrawn with above liberty.
(M.M.S. BEDI)
September 20, 2012. JUDGE rka
Manoj Kumar
State of Haryana
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court