Sangeeta v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants interim bail to a female petitioner in a criminal case involving an alleged outrage of modesty. The court addresses arguments regarding potential witness influence, noting such influences were not substantiated at the time.
What the court decided
CRIMINAL MISC. M NO.15191 OF 2012 :{ 1 }:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DATE OF DECISION: JULY 20, 2012
Sangeeta
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
- Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?
- To be referred to the Reporters or not?
- Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in a case involving an allegation of outraging modesty.
Whether the petitioner's alleged conduct or false accusations pose a threat to witnesses warranting denial of bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sangeeta
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
Ranjit Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/15191/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court