Petitioners' counsel sought permission to withdraw the drawn petition. The court granted leave to withdraw with liberty to file a fresh one if necessary and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one if necessity arises granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.M-No.14524 of 2012(O & M) Date of Decision:16.05.2012
Neha & anr.
.....petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors.
.....respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present: Ms.Anubhuti Walia, Advocate for the petitioners
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J.(ORAL):
Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, submits that she has got the instructions from the petitioners not to press this petition in the present form. Thus, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one.
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without prejudice to the rights of the parties, the instant petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh one, if necessity arises.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE
16.05.2012 neenu
Neha & anr.
State of Punjab & Ors.
Rameshwar Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
