Dismissed
Baljeet Kumar and Anr. v. Ut of Chandigarh and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/14337/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-14337 of 2012 Date of Decision: 24.08.2012
Baljeet Kumar and another
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Union Territory Chandigarh and others ....Respondents
BEFORE :- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:None for the petitioners.
Mr. Sarfraz Hussain, Advocate for the U.T. Chandigarh.
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the respondent-U.T. Chandigarh, on instructions from Sub Inspector Giarsi Lal, submits that as per the statement of petitioner No.2, they are not in need of any protection.
In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the respondent-U.T. Chandigarh, no further direction is required to be issued and the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
24.08.2012 gurpreet
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
Baljeet Kumar
State of Union Territory Chandigarh
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court