The High Court disposed of a petition under Section 482 CrPC, directing respondent No. 2 to investigate grievances and take necessary measures to protect the petitioners from respondents Nos. 4 and 5.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 13445 of 2012 Date of decision: 08.05.2012
Anita and another
........ Petitioners
Versus
State of U T, Chandigarh and others .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. D S Nigha, Advocate for the petitioners
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for issuance of directions to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No. 4 and 5.
The petitioners along with the counsel are present in Court today.
The present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2, to look into the grievances of the petitioners and, if found necessary, take appropriate measures, in accordance with the law.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
08.05.2012 mohan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent Nos. 2 and 3 should be directed to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anita and another
State of U T, Chandigarh
others
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
