Single judge disposed of a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking protection for petitioners from threats by respondent No.4. The court directed respondent No.2 to examine the grievances and take necessary legal measures.
Direction to respondent No.2 to investigate grievances and take appropriate measures if necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-13338 of 2012
Date of Decision: 08.05.2012
Samreet Dhillon and another
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present:Mr. Hardeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C for issuance
of directions to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent No.4.
The petitioners along with the counsel are present in the Court today.
The present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the grievances of the petitioners and if found necessary, take appropriate measures, in accordance with law.
(NIRMALJIT KAUR) 08.05.2012 JUDGE gurpreet
3 issues framed by the court
Whether directions should be issued under Section 482 Cr.P.C to protect petitioners from threats by respondent No.4.
Whether respondent No.2 should look into the grievances of the petitioners.
What appropriate measures should be taken to safeguard the lives and liberty of the petitioners.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Samreet Dhillon
another
State of Punjab
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
