The petitioner, present in court, filed an affidavit and sought permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition. The Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-10840 of 2012(O & M) Date of Decision: 18.5.2012
Rajeshwari Mishra
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present: Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Dhir, Deputy A.G., Haryana.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J.(ORAL):
Petitioner is present in Court and identified by her counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record the affidavit dated 18.5.2012, sworn-in by the petitioner.
In view of the affidavit filed by the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without prejudice to the rights of the parties, the instant petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE
18.5.2012 AK Sharma.
Rajeshwari Mishra
State of Haryana
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
