Petitioner in Civil Revision No.3398 of 2012 sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition, resulting in the dismissal of the matter as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the revision petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CIVIL REVISION NO.3398 OF 2012 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 30th MAY 2012
Surinder Kumar
…. Petitioner
Versus
Sanjeev Bector
…. Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Ms. Minakshi Poswal, Advocate for Mr. R. S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time,
seeks permission to withdraw the instant revision petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
30th May, 2012 (L. N. MITTAL) ‘raj’ JUDGE
Surinder Kumar
Sanjeev Bector
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
