The Court discharged the rule against respondents, directing payment of benefits within two months. Petitioners were advised to revive the petition if benefits were not paid.
Discharge of rule; direction to pay benefits within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.O.C.P. NO.772 of 2012(O&M)
DATE OF DECISION : 19.11.2012
Gurnam Singh and others PETITIONERS VERSUS
Shri Hussan Lal and another
RESPONDENTS
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present:Shri R.K.Arora, Advocate for the petitioners.
Shri A.P.S.Mann, Additional A.G. Punjab.
MAHESH GROVER, J.
An affidavit has been filed in an identical petition i.e. C.O.C.P. No.1845 of 2011 indicating that the exercise to give the necessary benefits to the petitioners is underway and since it involves various other Departments as well, it will take atleast two months time to release the benefits to the petitioners.
Having considered the affidavit that has been filed in the Court, the Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the instant petition by discharging the rule against the respondents with a direction that the necessary benefits as prayed for by the petitioners and granted by this Court vide its earlier order should be paid to them positively within a period of two months from today. In case the needful is not done, the petitioners shall be at liberty to revive the instant petition.
Petition stands disposed of.
(MAHESH GROVER) November 19, 2012 JUDGE GD
Gurnam Singh and others
Shri Hussan Lal and another
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
