The High Court dropped contempt proceedings upon the filing of a reply-affidavit showing compliance with a prior order. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the competent authority.
Contempt proceedings dropped with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority if required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.O.C.P.No.25 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : February 03, 2012
Tarsem Lal Loona
..... Petitioner
versus
Sh.Mandeep Singh and another ..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
Present : Mr.R.S.Manhas, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Suvir Sehgal, Additional AG, Punjab.
-.-
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
(Oral) Surya Kant, J.
Reply-affidavit filed by the respondents in Court is taken on
record.
As per the averments made in the reply-affidavit, in compliance to the order dated 1.9.2011, a speaking order dated 17.1.2012 has been passed a copy whereof has been placed on record.
In this view of the matter, there is no necessity to continue with these contempt proceedings which are accordingly dropped. The contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority, if so required.
February 03, 2012 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE
Tarsem Lal Loona
Sh. Mandeep Singh
Another
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
