Petitioner seeking promotion benefits was ordered granted promotion with Retroactive date, but actual benefits issued much later. Court dropped proceedings as no reason existed to continue.
COCP No.24 of 2012 dropped; liberty granted to impugn the order if dissatisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
COCP No.24 of 2012
Date of Decision: February 03, 2012
Shanti Devi Rawat
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
DPS Nagal, IAS, Chief Administrator, HUDA, Sector-6, Panchkula (Haryana)
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
PRESENT: - Mr. K.L. Dhingra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Monish Bansal, Advocate, for the respondent.
. . .
Surya Kant, J (Oral)
record an order dated 20.1.2012 whereby the petitioner has been
granted promotion on the post of Assistant w.e.f. 6.11.1987 but actual benefits have been granted to him w.e.f. 31.5.2002. There appears to be no reason whatsoever to continue with proceedings
COCP No.24 of 2012 [2]
and the same are hereby dropped.
liberty is granted to him to impugn the aforestated order before an appropriate forum.
(Surya Kant) February 03, 2012 Judge avin
Shanti Devi Rawat
DPS Nagal
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
