In a writ petition concerning service dispute over promotion dates, the single judge held that since the respondent had already granted the petitioner promotion, the proceedings were redundant and were dropped.
Rule discharged and the application dropped; liberty granted to approach appropriate forum if dissatisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
COCP No.23 of 2012
Date of Decision: February 03, 2012
Ashwani Kumar Sharma
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
DPS Nagal, IAS, Chief Administrator, HUDA, Sector-6, Panchkula (Haryana) & another
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
PRESENT: - Mr. K.L. Dhingra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Monish Bansal, Advocate, for the respondents.
. . .
Surya Kant, J (Oral)
record an order dated 20.1.2012 whereby the petitioner has been
granted promotion on the post of Assistant w.e.f. 6.11.1987 but actual benefits have been granted to him w.e.f. 31.5.2002. There appears to be no reason whatsoever to continue with proceedings
COCP No.23 of 2012 [2]
and the same are hereby dropped.
liberty is granted to him to impugn the aforestated order before an appropriate forum.
(Surya Kant) February 03, 2012 Judge avin
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the proceedings for promotion dispute should continue given the grant of promotion by the respondent.
Ashwani Kumar Sharma
DPS Nagal, IAS, Chief Administrator, HUDA, Sector-6, Panchkula (Haryana)
another
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
